Water, farm bill drive talks at food and agricultural summit
By Christine Souza
The outlook for California’s agricultural economy shows some signs of improvement after several years of supply-chain constraints, high input costs and a multiyear drought that forced farmers to fallow acres and remove orchards.
Drenching storms that hit the state early this year turned the tide, contributing to a more positive outlook for agriculture this year, an economic analyst told attendees during a food and agriculture issues summit in Sacramento last week.
“A year ago, we were discussing logistical bottlenecks and elevated fertilizer prices in the middle of an exceptional drought,” said David Magaña, a Rabobank vice president and senior analyst based in Fresno. “Now, we see port congestion getting better, availability of containers is improving and the water situation is better as we go from zero water allocation to a 100% water allocation.”
Magaña offered insights as part of the Food & Ag Issues Summit West, held June 5. The event was presented by Agri-Pulse, with the California Farm Bureau among the top sponsors. It brought together farmers, agricultural leaders, researchers and state officials for discussions on topics including water, labor and policy.
In his economic outlook for California agriculture, Magaña said challenges remain on the demand side as consumers adjust to the inflationary environment, including higher food costs. He said he expects the trend to continue before declining in the next few years.
“In the long run, we’ll continue to see this massive collision of forces of increased demand for food globally and supply-side constraints that are water, labor and regulatory,” Magaña said. “In the future, there will be a lot of opportunities to continue growing food for a global population.”
Daniel Sumner, director of the University of California Agricultural Issues Center, spoke about global pressures affecting farmers. The agricultural and resource economics professor at UC Davis said commodities such as winegrapes, tree fruit and nuts face more competition from around the world.
At home, Sumner said, the No. 1 challenge affecting farmers is “dealing with regulations.” To be successful, he said, farmers must be given flexibility to innovate and adapt.
Affecting farmers statewide is California’s 2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, or SGMA, which requires local agencies to bring groundwater aquifers into balance by the 2040s.
Fresno County farmer Don Cameron joined a panel in discussing the feasibility of groundwater recharge. Cameron said replenishing groundwater is “a simple operation,” which is “taking water when it’s available to bring it on the farm and allow it to trickle down into the aquifer.” But he added, “There’s more to it than that: You have to have the conveyance and the infrastructure.”
When stretching the water supply, California farmers could either idle farmland or find water, which is why capturing floodwater is key, said Cameron, president of the California State Board of Food and Agriculture.
In discussing roadblocks to groundwater recharge, Fresno County farmer Stuart Woolf of Woolf Farming said more certainty about when and under what circumstances water would be available would help farmers.
“If we knew that under certain conditions and certain flows there would be water available, we would go out on our farm and make greater investments to avail ourselves of those opportunities,” Woolf said. “For us to do 25,000 acre-feet this year, we’re going to spend $3 million or $4 million. There’s a lot of money that goes into just putting the water into the ground.”
Woolf suggested the state should plan better and have a greater sense of urgency to take advantage of floodwaters. He said, “In the wet periods, we need to have a target of 5 million acre-feet or 6 million acre-feet (of groundwater recharge).”
California Department of Water Resources Director Karla Nemeth estimated the state has about 3.3 million acre-feet of capacity for groundwater recharge. She described 2023 as a “stunning water year for California,” noting that the state quickly emerged from one of the deepest droughts on record with most reservoirs now brimming with water.
The state announced last week that since late last year, it has authorized the diversion of 1.2 million acre-feet of water for underground storage, wildlife refuges and other purposes. This is in addition to an estimated 90,000 acre-feet of floodwater diverted to underground aquifers permitted through Gov. Gavin Newsom’s executive order.
“We will have these very intense storm events that can build an entire water year that pulls us out of a drought,” Nemeth said. “We can also have intense storm conditions in the middle of a year that also turns out to be dry. That’s been the story of the last three-plus years.”
During a discussion on the 2023 Farm Bill, California Farm Bureau President Jamie Johansson joined specialty crop leaders in addressing how commodities such as fruits, vegetables and nuts might fare in the omnibus legislation.
With members of Congress reaching an agreement on the debt ceiling to avoid a default, Johansson said, “This changes the whole game” and “relieves some of the pressure so that we can start to have some real discussions.” The next farm bill is expected to cost $1.5 trillion. The 2018 Farm Bill expires in September.
“It is the first time that the conversation really seems to be happening at both kitchen tables in San Francisco or Los Angeles, as well as on my family’s and members’ farm tables,” Johansson said. “There are a lot of challenges, so when we talk about programs—soil conservation, disaster relief and insurance needs of commodities—consumers now see this front and center, from wildfires and hurricanes as well as rising food prices.”
Aubrey Bettencourt, president and CEO of the Almond Alliance of California, emphasized the need for the next farm bill to include improved disaster programs.
“Our disaster programs are horrendous and disgusting and disrespectful to our farmers. At least for the West, we can’t qualify for even disaster programs because of the AGI (adjusted gross income) requirements,” Bettencourt said. “It’s not our fault that our 40-acre guy grows a high-value crop that the world wants and, when he’s wiped out from a freeze, there isn’t an insurance product available and he’s got a wait a year to see if he will survive or have any assistance in the next year.”
She said her members also want to see funding increased in the Market Access Program and Market Facilitation Program “to move our product into a new generation post-COVID, post pandemic and post supply-chain disruption.”
Ian LeMay, president of the California Fresh Fruit Association, said strengthening the domestic food supply is critical.
“We had a very unique experience in the last five years. For the first time, at least in my lifetime, people went to the grocery store and saw a shortage on the shelves,” LeMay said. “Our members are wholly capable of supplying our domestic food production, but we need that assistance.
“A domestic food supply needs to be fortified,” he added.
As California farmers face a shrinking supply of employees, some have advocated for increased automation. LeMay suggested the farm bill include grant funding to help more farmers to modernize and enhance food production.
“We can research and develop all we want, but unless we help the market, then adopt these new technologies, we can’t capitalize it quick enough,” LeMay said, adding that labor is 70% of total costs for most of the commodities he represents. “We have to create efficiencies within our operations so that we can continue to propel our commodity sectors forward.”
To ensure California is successful in growing the food supply that’s needed in the future, Sumner said, “the long haul for agriculture really is in innovation” and attracting innovators and new technologies to farming.
“That’s been true for 100 years,” he said. “And it’s going to continue to be true for the next 100.”
(Christine Souza is an assistant editor of Ag Alert. She may be contacted at csouza@cfbf.com.)